European Standards Map

Germany

EMII gratefully acknowledges the help of the following people in Germany:

Monika Hagedorn-Saupe, Insititute for Museum Studies, State Museums of Berlin
Axel Ermert, Insititute for Museum Studies, State Museums of Berlin


National Overview ¦ International Initiatives ¦ National Initiatives ¦ Regional Initiatives ¦ Procedural Standards ¦ Information Management Standards ¦ Future Vision for EMII ¦ Home

National Overview

The definition of museum has been under discussion by the German Museum Association (DMB) for some time as continuously reported in its journal 'Museumskunde'. For the time being, the ICOM definition has been officially adopted, in its original language form. For the German Museums Statistics, the IfM uses a slightly broader definition, consisting of 4 operational criteria.

Germany is a federal state composed of 16 Bundesländer with far reaching autonomy in cultural matters. There is no single act or series of acts at national level (federal government) or at the level of any of the 16 Bundesländer governing the activities of museums in Germany. There are a number of legislation issues addressed in a variety of acts that are relevant to all museums, for example labour relations, or valid for certain museums only. Some museums at 'national' level or ranking at high level in the Bundesländer are legally established as public corporate bodies or foundations (Stifungsgesetz). For example this applies to the State Museums of Berlin of the Stiftung Preubischer Kulturbesitz (SMB/SPK).

The ICOM Code of Ethics was translated by ICOM Germany and officially issued to all German museums in 1998 (German version of the ICOM Code of Ethics), following its publication in the former DDR in 1978. There is no formal commitment to the code by German museums. However, Germany has the largest number of ICOM members in Europe (1,880) for whom the code should be a binding one. On this basis it is not unjustified to assume adherance to the code.

There is no single organisation or body responsible for co-ordinating national museum documentation and information management standards. There are state bodies (for example Museumsämter and Landesstellen) in most Bunderländer as well as independent museum associations in most of them which together carry the main burden of museum counselling. For Germany as a whole, there are 2 main sources for museum statistics, with the Institut für Museumskunde (IfM) having the widest coverage.

The Institut für Museumskunde, a research institute of the SMB within the Prussian Cultural Heritage Foundation (SPK), is the only body that works for all museums throughout Germany. It aims to monitor the national and international scene and offers advice on request. It does not have the authority to issue formal rules, guidelines, standards but it does issue reference material, guides, state-of-the-art papers, focus documents etc.

The regional museum associations and counselling bodies cover many of the practical aspects of museum documentation. At the Bundesländer level, are some special interest groups, pertaining to the given region, which serve as fora on documentation matters. The DMB has a special interest group "Dokumentation" (which holds meetings twice a year and serves as a forum of exchange of experience, and of continuing education). At times, ministries in the invidual Bundesländer adopt a co-ordinated approach to initiatives in a limited number of museums directly under their control. For example, development of documentation software.

Finally, some overall harmonisation results from de facto developments such as the collaborative use of the same software in a same subject area, for example art history.

The total number of museums in Germany (IfM statistics) in 1998 is 5,752. The IfM also counted 484 non-commercial galleries/exhibition centres in 1998.

In 1998 the IfM counted 3,044 public museums (run under different forms of state authority), 1,097 'private' museums and 325 combined museums. (IfM statistics)

Employment

The 1992 survey of the Association of German municipalities lists 13,323 full-time, 6,095 part-time staff, 4,345 volunteers and 1,973 free-lance workers employed in its 2090 (public and private) museums. Note: this only refers to 2,090 of the then 4,475 German museums (as counted by the IfM).

Information Management

The partner was not able to supply the percentage of undocumented versus documented collections and to what level, basic (to a national minimum standard) or catalogued in detail. According to the 1998 questionnaire, 1,158 museums use computers for object documentation, another 385 plan to do so in the coming year. There is no one single national museum object database in Germany, with full coverage nation-wide or by subject area. There is, however, one prominent database in the subject area of art history with supra-local coverage, and there are at least 2 regional museum databases construction in Bayern and Sachsen Bundesland.

Images and Multimedia

In 1997, at least 349 museums used computers to store digital images, and another 160 planned to do so. It was not possible to discern for what purpose in each case the digital images had been produced. The IfM holds a collection of some 150 museum CD ROMs covering some 100 museums. The 1997 survey showed 194 museums using interactive gallery systems.

Museums and the Internet

1,410 museums have Internet access for web browsing, based on 62.3% of museums responding to a 1998 survey. 827 museums have a Web site of which 143 explicitly indicate in the 1998 survey that they present collection objects on the web. In 1997, 635 German museums with email addresses were registered with the IfM. The figure will, when updated now, be considerably higher.


¦ National Overview ¦ International Initiatives ¦ National Initiatives ¦ Regional Initiatives ¦ Procedural Standards ¦ Information Management Standards ¦ Future Vision for EMII ¦ Home

International, National and Regional Initiatives

We asked partners to describe current or recently completed international initiatives to facilitate remote access to cultual hertiage information. These can include participation in professional working groups and other EC funded projects.


¦ National Overview ¦ International Initiatives ¦ National Initiatives ¦ Regional Initiatives ¦ Procedural Standards ¦ Information Management Standards ¦ Future Vision for EMII ¦ Home

Procedural Standards

There are no formal collections management procedures in Germany. Basic literature exists, and selection is given below. Some of this literature is educational, for example staff training. It is assumed that larger and specialist museums have developed in-house bespoke procedures.

We also asked what Collections Management Software is in use:

Partners Comments: The second attempt to gain an overview of software for museum documentation in use (a market review would be another aspect) in German museums was made along with the annual survey covering German museums for 1998.

5.376 museums received the questionnaire, 3.968 answered this question, 2.373 used computers at all for some application in the museum, 1.158 used computers for object documentation. MS/ACCESS, HIDA/MIDAS, FAUST, FirstRumos, LARS, FileMaker, dBase, works, GOS, AllegroC were some of the programmes named by a relevant number of museums. A large number of in-house developments were also counted.

Many more details complicate the picture, so that this enumeration does not yet give a complete picture. Independent of this, a Working Group has prepared a software review on 17 programmes then publicly available on the German market: Software-Vergleich Museumsdokumentation, 1998 (available through the Institute for Museum Studies).

Procedural standards in use:


¦ National Overview ¦ International Initiatives ¦ National Initiatives ¦ Regional Initiatives ¦ Procedural Standards ¦ Information Management Standards ¦ Future Vision for EMII ¦ Home

Information Management Standards

We asked about:

Content and Resource Description Standards

Partners Comments: Dictionarium Museologicum is to some degree known in the German museum world, but does not seem to have its emphasis on collection description. Also, its use seems to be restricted partly because of lacking terms, partly because some term translations are challenged.

ISO 5127-3 is a carefully done (though not exhaustive) classification and a defining tool but does not seem to be widespread yet in German museums. A German translation to be officially released had been envisaged but this has not yet materialized. Valuable and very comprehensive foreign-language sources like the "Vocabulaires" accompanying the Inventaire Génerale, or the AAT can be taken to be known, and are discussed, to some degree but do not yet seem to be used on a regular basis in German museums, to some degree because of the language barrier. Translation of some such sources as a major undertaking has been discussed, without any known results by now. LCSH does not seem to be used in German museums.

ICONCLASS is being used in a number of collections and is referred to for use by the HIDA/MIDAS system. The use of "Costume Vocabulary" and of SHIC can be assumed for some museums while none of "Nomenclature" is presently known.


Term Lists in use include:

Classification systems in use include:

Content and Structure Description Standards

Partners Comments: ISO 639 and ISO 3166 are widespread in a number of communication areas (though other systems - particularly in the country code field - do exist), not the least through a number of applications through EU and EU data bases. They do not seem to be used in museums, though.

The ISO yyyy/mm/dd standard is well known in many computer areas but in the other communication areas the dd/mm/yyyy format is the one mainly used (as is the case in this EMII questionnaire). This seems different from Austria where yy/mm/dd seems more often used. Other than these, the metric system is fully used in Germany (including length, weight applications etc.) notwithstanding traditional systems to be used in everyday practice and - thus - , of course, in museum object descriptions, especially those dating back some time.

Technological Standards and Protocols

The German partner was not able to answer the questions in relation to: data presentation and encoding standards, image format standards, searching distributed databases and protection of intellectual property.


¦ National Overview ¦ International Initiatives ¦ National Initiatives ¦ Regional Initiatives ¦ Procedural Standards ¦ Information Management Standards ¦ Future Vision for EMII ¦ Home

Future Vision

The German partners response to our question:

'Please use this space to describe ways in which you consider EMII should develop to provide a value added resource to museums in your country. Feel free to address any aspect of our current remit or to propose new roles. You may be as detailed as you like and include references to publications, Web sites, iniatives etc. Whilst we are developing our vision for EMII's future activities we also want to ensure that we capture your needs and concerns.'

While this item will be discussed still in much more detail, not the least as a follow-up of the next Steering Committee meetings, 2 main remarks can certainly be made at this stage:

1) It is important to take full advantage of the European survey on which some work has been invested over the last months, but still, work has only started. This is a cumulative effort and also one which requires work to detail, so full profit can be gained only after a period of time. Continuing and improving the survey is an importnat task to be pursued further by EMII.

2) Building on the results of 1), the EMII Web site and its staff services should be extended considerably, to form an authoritative, comprehensive platform for European museums. This includes both a considerably extended link list and different offers of services, such as relating to EU museum-related programmes, but also advice and useful hints on practical questions.
3) Considering that more and more work is (expected) these days (to be) carried out in projects, often extremely limited in time or even short-lived, a central reference "backbone" becomes of more and more importance. EMII is an ideal toll to form such a backbone, and should definitely be continued so as to ensure the presence of it least one stable, permanent, reliable infratsructure "backbone" to which to refer in the great and sometimes not fully overseeable wealth of individual initiatives and projects.



¦ National Overview ¦ International Initiatives ¦ National Initiatives ¦ Regional Initiatives ¦ Procedural Standards ¦ Information Management Standards ¦ Future Vision for EMII

Standards Map Home Page------------Home Page


Funded by the European Commission -Education and Culture Directorate-General - Raphaël Programme

Created on 07 July 2000