
EMII gratefully acknowledges the help of the following
people in the Denmark:
Michael Lauenborg, Danish National Council of
Museums
Kirsten Vittrup, Danish Art Index
Henrik Hansen, Central Cultural
Historical Archive
Jorgen Christoffersen, Danish National Museum
National Overview ¦ International
Initiatives ¦ National Initiatives ¦
Regional Initiatives ¦ Procedural
Standards ¦ Information Management Standards
¦ Future Vision for EMII ¦
Home
There is not a published definition of museum in Denmark
but the Museum Act contains the following:
"Through
collection, registration, conservation, research and communication the museums
shall:
Act on Museums, etc Ministry of Culture Order no. 584 of
August 31, 1989
The body responsible for co-ordinating documentation in
Denmark is the Danish National
Council of Museums
Danish museums are not obliged to subscribe to
ICOM Code of Professional Ethics.
The total number of museums in Denmark is estimated at 300 and all are
considered public. It was not possible to estimate the total collections size.
| Total No of Museums: |
Total No of Objects: |
Figures are: | |
| National | 9 | 0 | Actual |
| State | 0 | 0 | Actual |
| Regional | 5 | 0 | Actual |
| Local Authority | 24 | 0 | Actual |
| University | 4 | 0 | Actual |
| Military | 0 | 0 | Actual |
| Independent institutions, State recognized |
117 | 0 | Actual |
| *Other | 150 | 0 | Actual |
There are an estimated 3,500 people in full time (more than 35 hours per week) employment , 0 in part-time paid employment and an estimated 2,000 working on a voluntary basis.
Percentage of cultural heritage held in Museums that is:
| % | Figures are: | ||
| Undocumented | 10 | Estimated | |
| Documented | 90 | Estimated | |
| Total | 100% | ||
An estimated 150 museums use computers for documentation but it was not possible to estimate the percentage of cultural heritage that is documented to a basic standard or catalogued in detail. National Guidelines are avialable: 'Danish Museum Documentation Standards' on the web site of The National Council of Museums (in Danish).
Approximately 20 museums have published CD-ROMS and around 30 have interactive gallery systems. The partner was not able to quantify the percentage of museums with digital images of all or part of their collections and for what purposes images have have been produced.
It is estimated that around 200 museums have Internet access for Web browsing and email. Around 200 museums have their own Web site of which 20 have collections databases on-line. The partner was not able to indicate how many Web sites are brochureware only or have some educational content.
¦
National Overview ¦ International
Initiatives ¦ National Initiatives ¦
Regional Initiatives ¦ Procedural
Standards ¦ Information Management Standards
¦ Future Vision for EMII ¦
Home
We asked partners to describe current or recently completed international initiatives to facilitate remote access to cultual heritage information. These can include participation in professional working groups and other EC funded projects.
See also Nordic Outline ("Nordisk Outline") for details of an international initiative involving Denmark, Iceland, Norway and Sweden to harmonise their respective translations of Outline.
¦
National Overview ¦ International
Initiatives ¦ National Initiatives ¦
Regional Initiatives ¦ Procedural
Standards ¦ Information Management Standards
¦ Future Vision for EMII ¦
Home
Almost all Danish Museums use SPECTRUM: The UK Museum Documentation Standard. In addition, "Saglig registrant for de kulturhistoriske museer". 1954 is used.
The partner was not able to answer what Collections Management Software is in use.
¦
National Overview ¦ International
Initiatives ¦ National Initiatives ¦
Regional Initiatives ¦ Procedural
Standards ¦ Information Management Standards
¦ Future Vision for EMII ¦
Home
We asked about:
Classification Systems in use include:
The questions relating to content and structure description
standards were difficult to answer in Denmark. However, one museum is using a
metadata schema 'DKC' for event and object classification. The partner has made
the following comments in relation to the concept of 'object' :
'We
classify not only physical objects which at some point of time entered a museum
(with or without available acquisition-data). We also classify metaphysical "objects",
i.e. legends and myths, oral tradition and such connected to a location. This
location may - or may not have any other physical remains of cultural activity.
Secondly we also classify objects/artefacts, which are only known through oral
tradition handed over to professional surveyors, - indeed these objects
constitute more than 50 % of our archival records on objects and thereby our
knowledge/idea of what was - and is representative in a museum collection of "hard
physical artefacts". '
The Danish partner was not able to answer the questions in relation to: data presentation and encoding standards, image format standards, searching distributed databases and protection of intellectual property.
¦
National Overview ¦ International
Initiatives ¦ National Initiatives ¦
Regional Initiatives ¦ Procedural
Standards ¦ Information Management Standards
¦ Future Vision for EMII ¦
Home
The Danish response to our question:
'Please use this space to describe ways in which you consider EMII should develop to provide a value added resource to museums in your country. Feel free to address any aspect of our current remit or to propose new roles. You may be as detailed as you like and include references to publications, Web sites, iniatives etc. Whilst we are developing our vision for EMII's future activities we also want to ensure that we capture your needs and concerns.'
First of all - it is very important that EMII will
continue and develop. One of the main goals must be, that EMII will provide
easier multimedia access to Europe's cultural heritage, both for museums
professionals and for everyone else.
EMII means "Museums'
Information Institute". Therefore EMII has to provide information primarily
to the museums. It should be information about the EU and about access to the
knowledge about our cultural heritage and the knowledge that the museums can
provide in this area.
EMII must be a tool for museums, a tool they can
not "live without". As mentioned it of great importance for Denmark,
that EMII will develop, and if it is going to be so, museums in Europe must have
some kind of benefit from EMII - They must feel that they can use EMII in their
daily work.
It is important that EMII are able to provide information
about the possibilities in EU programs from where museums have an opportunity to
seek support to their work. And it is important, that the EU can use EMII to
provide information.
And it is important that EMII can help museums to
find partners to their projects. It is important that EMII in the future is
able to give advice to museums in Europe about standards etc. so that they in
the future are able to give us all access to their cultural heritage.
From
EMII's homepage there must be links to other Web sites that can be of interest
for the museum in relation to multimedia access to our cultural heritage.
From
EMII's homepage we all in the future should have the possibility, through links,
to have access to information about the museums in the different countries and
their collections.
From EMII's homepage we all should have information
about the museum structure in each country. In Denmark we really need this kind
of information.
If EMII does not manage to have financial support from
the EU, we find it important that the countries involved in the project will
support EMII so we are able to continue the work.
¦
National Overview ¦ International
Initiatives ¦ National Initiatives ¦
Regional Initiatives ¦ Procedural
Standards ¦ Information Management Standards
¦ Future Vision for EMII ¦
Home
|
Standards Map Home Page------------Home Page |
Funded by the
European Commission -Education
and Culture Directorate-General -
Raphaël
Programme
Created on 07 July 2000