
EMII gratefully acknowledges the help of the following
people in Iceland:
Lilja Árnadóttir, Head of Collections
Management, National Museum of Iceland
Frosti Johannsson, Systems
Development, National Museum of Iceland
National Overview ¦ International
Initiatives ¦ National Initiatives ¦
Regional Initiatives ¦ Procedural
Standards ¦ Information Management Standards
¦ Future Vision for EMII ¦
Home
The national definition of museum in Iceland is published
in the National Heritage Act and National Gallery Act: [To be supplied by
partner]
The total number of museums in Iceland is 51 with collections
totalling 3,616,195 objects. The partner estimated that 50% (or less) of
Icelandic museums comply with the
ICOM Code of Professional Ethics.
The ratio of public museums versus private owned and run museums is 44 to 7.
Public museums can be defined as:
'Museums and collections open for the public most often in
possession of either the state or a region.'
And private museums
as:
'Museums and collections governed as a freehold property eg owned
by a private person, society or a company.'
| Total No of Museums: |
Total No of Objects: |
Figures are: | |
| National | 3 | 1,970,000 | Estimated |
| State | 6 | 10,000 | Estimated |
| Regional | 0 | n/a | n/a |
| Local Authority | 32 | 1,630,000 | n/a |
| University | 0 | n/a | n/a |
| Military | 0 | n/a | n/a |
| Labour Union | 1 | 800 | Actual |
| Total No
of Museums: |
Total No
of Objects: |
Figures are: | |
| Independent | 0 | n/a | n/a |
| Company | 2 | 2,700 | Estimated |
| Charitable Institutions | 1 | 500 | Estimated |
| Charitable Trusts | 0 | n/a | n/a |
| Church | 0 | n/a | n/a |
| Private Associations | 1 | 300 | Estimated |
| Private Foundations | 3 | 1,695 | Estimated |
| Private Individuals | 1 | 1,000 | Estimated |
Sources: Information gathered by interviewing museums directors and curators. Information from the National Museum of Iceland.
There are an estimated 120 people in full time (more than 35 hours per week) employment in Icelandic museums and 20 in part-time paid employment. There are no volunteers, it is noted that voluntary work is very unusal in Iceland. The figures do not include warding staff and guides.
Percentage of cultural heritage held in Museums that is:
| % | Figures are: | ||
| Undocumented | 40 | Estimated | |
| Documented | 60 | Estimated | |
| Total | 100% | ||
Partners Comment: It should be noted that in some museums everything is documented while in others part of the collection is waiting to be documented.
For documented collections, what percentage is:
| % | Manually only |
Manually and Digitally |
Digitally only |
Figures are: | |
| Documented to basic level1 | 60 | 50 | 0 | 0 | Estimated |
| Catalogued in detail2 | 40 | 50 | 0 | 0 | Estimated |
| Total | 100% | ||||
(1) To national minimum standard where one exists or international alternative. (2) Catalogued beyond national minimum standard.
An estimated 35 museums record information digitally all of which is held in institutional databases at present. There are no national guidelines for documentation. The database system, SARPUR, conceived and developed at the National Museum and launched in spring 2000 aims to standardise and coordinate registration of information about cultural heritage in Iceland. SARPUR will function within both public and private cultural-historical museums and companies dealing with cultural heritage. Museums will access SARPUR via the Internet and contribute their data which will be held on a server based at the National Museum.
There ae no published CD-Roms in Iceland and no interactive
gallery systems although 2 museums are planning to install gallery interactives
by the end of 2001.
Percentage of museums with digital images of all or part of their
collections:
| % of Museums: | No of Objects: |
Figures are: | |
| Public museums | 10 | 15,000 | Estimated |
| Private museums | 0 | 0 | Unknown |
Digital images were produced for the following purposes:
| % of Images: |
No of Objects: |
Figures are: | |
| CD-ROM Publishing | 0 | 0 | Actual |
| Collections Management | 10 | 0 | Estimated |
| Education | 10 | 0 | Estimated |
| Exhibition | 10 | 0 | Estimated |
| Publication | 0 | 0 | Unknown |
| Publicity | 0 | 0 | Unknown |
| Security | 0 | 0 | Unknown |
| World Wide Web | 5 | 0 | Estimated |
| Other | 0 | 0 | Unknown |
It is estimated that 40 museums have Internet access for web browsing and email. 25 have a Web site of which 10 are brochureware only and 15 include educational content. There are no collections databases on-line at present but 20 museums plan to have part of their collections databases on-line by December 2002.
¦
National Overview ¦ International
Initiatives ¦ National Initiatives ¦
Regional Initiatives ¦ Procedural
Standards ¦ Information Management Standards
¦ Future Vision for EMII ¦
Home
We asked partners to describe current or recently completed international initiatives to facilitate remote access to cultual hertiage information. These can include participation in professional working groups and other EC funded projects.
The Icelandic national committee of ICOM consists of 40
individual and 6 institutional members across several international committees.
Not many of them have had an opportunity to be active in their committees work
through attending meetings and the general conference. In 1999 a national
committee of ICOMOS was established in Iceland. The Ministry of Culture and
Education supports the work of these national committees.
See
Nordic Outline ("Nordisk Outline") for
details of an international initiative involving Iceland, Denmark, Norway and
Sweden to harmonise their respective translations of Outline. There are no
national or regional initiatives to report.
¦
National Overview ¦ International
Initiatives ¦ National Initiatives ¦
Regional Initiatives ¦ Procedural
Standards ¦ Information Management Standards
¦ Future Vision for EMII ¦
Home
There is no national collection management standard. Most museums work to a collecting policy which specifies the parameters of their collecting activity. The national museums i.e. National Museum of Iceland and National Gallery of Iceland are required by legislation to acquire in certain fields.
We also asked what Collections Management Software is in use:
¦
National Overview ¦ International
Initiatives ¦ National Initiatives ¦
Regional Initiatives ¦ Procedural
Standards ¦ Information Management Standards
¦ Future Vision for EMII ¦
Home
We asked about:
Partners Comment: The information system SARPUR is made for
standardising and coordinating registration information about cultural
heritage. There are eight catalogues in the system: objects, photographs,
ethnological material, historical relics, listed houses, archaological
investigations, church/religous relics and place names. Sarpur incorporates
Outline for Cultural Material and a term list with 10.000 Icelandic terms drawn
from existing museum catalogues.
For cataloging listed houses and
archeological remains there are a limited number of term lists. Between 1960 and
1970 there was published by TANUM - NORLI Oslo term list dealing with textiles
and textile technique. The list is in Danish, Norwegian, Swedish, Icelandic,
Finnish, German, French and English.
In the early 1990's the National
Heritage Board determined that the classification system 'Outline for Cultural
Materials' should be used in cultural history museums in Iceland including the
National Museum of Iceland. This applies to approximately 15 museums with
collections estimated at 50,000 objects.
See
Nordic Outline ("Nordisk Outline") for
details of an international initiative involving Iceland, Denmark, Norway and
Sweden to harmonise their respective translations of Outline.
The Icelandic partner was not able to answer the questions in relation to content and structure description standards.
The Icelandic partner was not able to answer the questions in relation to: data presentation and encoding standards, image format standards, searching distributed databases and protection of intellectual property.
¦
National Overview ¦ International
Initiatives ¦ National Initiatives ¦
Regional Initiatives ¦ Procedural
Standards ¦ Information Management Standards
¦ Future Vision for EMII ¦
Home
The Icelandic response to our question:
'Please use this space to describe ways in which you consider EMII should develop to provide a value added resource to museums in your country. Feel free to address any aspect of our current remit or to propose new roles. You may be as detailed as you like and include references to publications, Web sites, iniatives etc. Whilst we are developing our vision for EMII's future activities we also want to ensure that we capture your needs and concerns.'
EMII is a good opportunity to learn how museums and
institutions in Europe work with the cultural heritage in terms of collecting,
registering, classifying and so on. We will be able to take advantage of what
our colleagues have been doing in other countries through so many years. The
museum structure in Iceland is young and relatively inexperienced. The growth in
numbers of museums is a recent phenonmenon coupled with the rise in qualified
staff working in the museum profession. This has led to a rapid growth in
Icelandic museums since the 1970s.
Because of the circumstances; Iceland being so small we have the
privilege to being able to overview the situation quite well. But even if we are
small we have almost the same issues to deal with as in other countries. This
means it is very important for museums in Iceland to get to know how problems
are solved in other countries. In EMII there is a opportunity to get answers to
questions we are dealing with every day in our work. Is it question of software,
different programs and systems and so on. We will be able to get information
about classification, terms list, standards and so on.
Our work on
SARPUR [National Museum of Iceland Collections Management System] is an example
of how our small circumstances helped us to make a holistic system dealing with
the cultural heritage. I do hope that in some way the work with EMII can advise
us in our very important work to get all the information into our product
SARPUR. We are now planning how we can solve our task to finish the unregistered
part of our collection. It would be a real benefit to be able to do that.
Our
work with SARPUR could be a sort of demo how a very small situation or scale can
be an advantage in work like this.
¦
National Overview ¦ International
Initiatives ¦ National Initiatives ¦
Regional Initiatives ¦ Procedural
Standards ¦ Information Management Standards
¦ Future Vision for EMII
|
Standards Map Home Page------------Home Page |
Funded by the
European Commission -Education
and Culture Directorate-General -
Raphaël
Programme
Created on 07 July 2000