
EMII gratefully acknowledges the help of the following
people in Portugal:
Isabel Cordeiro, Institute of Portuguese Museums
Inês
Freitas, Institute of Portuguese Museums
National Overview ¦ International
Initiatives ¦ National Initiatives ¦
Regional Initiatives ¦ Procedural
Standards ¦ Information Management Standards
¦ Future Vision for EMII ¦
Home
The Portuguese Association of Museology (APOM), an independent association of museum professionals, defines a museum as:
'an institution that serves the community, integrates, catalogues, researches, protects and divulges cultural goods with an educational aim.'
The Instituto de Português Museus (IPM) defines a museum in a broader way using 14 cumulative criteria drawn from ICOM's definition:
The activities of Portugese museums are formally governed by the Portuguese Institute of Museums Internal-Law, Decree-Law no 368-99 of October 13, 1999. This sets out the responsibilities of the IPM within the Portuguese museum community and defines its internal organization. In addition there is also the Cultural Heritage Law, Decree-Law no 13/85 of 1985. This legislation defines what may be considered as National Heritage, (portable and non-portable), levels of classification and legal implications attached. A new Basic-Law for Cultural Heritage is due to be presented to Parliament and voted during 2000.
The partner estimated that 50% (or less) of Portugese museums comply with the ICOM Code of Professional Ethics although in principle the profession does comply with ICOM ethical philosophy.
The body responsible for co-ordinating documentation within Portugal is the Institute of Portuguese Museums IPM, a public entity under the Ministry of Culture that, since 1992, has administered 28 museums distributed throughout Portugal, including collections of Art, Decorative Art, Archaeology and Ethnography (Decree-Law n 368-99 of October 13). Within the scope of its responsibilities, the IPM implements a museum policy that aims to safeguard and publicise Portuguese cultural heritage (excluding built heritage).
| Public | Private | Figures are: |
| 319 | 211 | Actual |
For the purposes of this survey the partner considered the total number of institutions that qualify as museums as 530 with collections totalling an estimated 5,303,048 objects.
The ratio of public museums versus private owned and run
museums is 319 to 211. In Portugal a museum is considered public or private
depending on its legal/jurisdictional status. Public museums can be defined as:
'Museums dependent and funded by public funds being them central,
regional or local administration funds.'
And private museums as:
'Non state funded being them private associations, foundations,
church, companies, church, private individuals.'
(They may receive
grants or non regular support from the state)
| Total No of Museums: |
Total No of Objects: |
Figures are: | |
| National | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| State | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Regional | 18 | 121,782 | Actual |
| Local Authority | 184 | 2,248,774 | Actual |
| University | 21 | 687,818 | Actual |
| Military | 13 | 197,209 | Actual |
| Ministry of Culture | 42 | 902,823 | Actual |
| Ministry Education/not university | 4 | 1,110 | Actual |
| Ministry of Science and Technology | 2 | n/a | Actual |
| Other Ministries | 16 | 132,176 | Actual |
| Public Companies | 19 | 149,869 | Actual |
| Total No
of Museums: |
Total No
of Objects: |
Figures are: | |
| Independent | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Company | 29 | 72,077 | Actual |
| Charitable Institutions | 17 | 27,876 | Actual |
| Charitable Trusts | 0 | n/a | n/a |
| Church | 41 | 25,795 | Actual |
| Private Associations | 65 | 202,326 | Actual |
| Private Foundations | 28 | 466,000 | Actual |
| Private Individuals | 20 | 50,922 | Actual |
| Others | 11 | 16,493 | Actual |
Others: Zoos, aquariums, botanical gardens and natural parks that have a museological section.
Source: Questionnaire on Museums and Museum Nucleii Instituto Português de Museus and Observatorio das Actividades Culturais, 1998. Report published March 2000.
There are 3217 people are in full time (more than 35 hours per week) employment in Portugese museums, 393 in part-time paid employment and a further 339 people work on a voluntary basis.
Percentage of cultural heritage held in Museums that is:
| % | Figures are: | ||
| Undocumented | 58 | Actual | |
| Documented | 42 | Actual | |
| Total | 100% | ||
159 museums record object information digitally all within institutional databases.
For documented collections, what percentage is:
(1) To national minimum standard where one exists or international alternative. (2) Catalogued beyond national minimum standard.
In Portugal there are detailed national documentation
guidelines. The IPM, Registration and Cataloguing Department, is responsible for
setting museum documentation standards and making them accessible to all
museums, public or private, that may be interested in using them. The IPM has
produced a standard cataloguing form, where all the information necessary for
documenting a museum object in detail may be recorded.
The IPM has
developed, within a partnership with a private company, software for cataloguing
and managing information on museum objects (Matriz). The structure of this
database complies with international standards such as the Getty Standards
Program (Categories for the Description of Works of Art) and the CIDOC
Guidelines for Museum Object Information. Within this project, and to facilitate
digitisation. The IPM has produced a Users Manual to facilitate manual and
digital documentation. The Institute is also publishing guidelines for
cataloguing different types of objects. Already published:
More titles will be published during the year 2000.
12 Portugese museums have published a total of 12 CD-Roms. A further 23 have interactive gallery systems.
Percentage of museums with digital images of all or part of their collections:
| % of Museums: | No of Objects: |
Figures are: | |
| Public museums | 24 | 0 | Actual |
| Private museums | 17 | 0 | Actual |
Digital images were produced for the following purposes:
| % of Images: |
No of Objects: |
Figures are: | |
| CD-ROM Publishing | 0 | 0 | Actual |
| Collections Management | 70 | 172296 | Actual |
| Education | 1 | 3000 | Actual |
| Exhibition | 0 | Actual | |
| Publication | 20 | 48016 | Actual |
| Publicity | 1 | 2382 | Actual |
| Security | 2 | 4806 | Actual |
| World Wide Web | 0.5 | 623 | Actual |
| Other | 5.5 | 13691 | Actual |
Partners Comment: These statistics refer to the following items: Collection Management, Publication of Exhibition Catalogues, General Publications, Research, Publicity, Multimedia, Security and Others. Where possible the Portugese partner has adapted their classification to the above. The zero figure against CD-ROM Publishing and Education is due to the fact that this is not recorded as a separate category for statistical purposes. However, images are produced for these purposes. In addition, it should be noted that the Portugese statistics refer to the production of images in general, including digital and non-digital images. All images are first produced and distributed as color transparencies, some of which may be digitized at a later date. The table refers to colour transparencies and therefore represents the potential total of digital images rather than the actual.
A national plan for digital imaging is taking place through the Division of Photography of the IPM. This Division produces images of all national relevant collections. The objective is to create an image database that will contain all the images produced by the division over the last decade. These images refer to portable heritage and include the most important objects in Portuguese collections, not only museums (public or private) but also private collections. All 28 IPM museums have their images produced by this division. Beside this national initiative, museums especially the local ones, are including images in their collections databases on an individual basis. Individual initiatives to digitise specific collections are also taking place, for example: Lisbon Municipality, Mário Soares Foundation and the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.
76 museums have Internet access for Web browsing and email, and 119 have Web sites of which 84 can be described as brochureware and 35 include some educational content. There are currently no museum databases on-line but 1 museum is planning to go on-line by December 2000. Beyond this there is little confirmed information available in Portugal on this subject. Intentions have been expressed but little has materialised to date. The IPM museums are discussing how this access should be provided and what level of access is desirable and appropriate for the general public. The exception is the Portuguese Institute of Archaeology (IPA), their database, Endovelicus, of archaeological sites and related objects will be online before December 2000.
¦
National Overview ¦ International
Initiatives ¦ National Initiatives ¦
Regional Initiatives ¦ Procedural
Standards ¦ Information Management Standards
¦ Future Vision for EMII ¦
Home
We asked partners to describe current or recently completed international initiatives to facilitate remote access to cultural hertiage information. These can include participation in professional working groups and other EC funded projects.
¦
National Overview ¦ International
Initiatives ¦ National Initiatives ¦
Regional Initiatives ¦ Procedural
Standards ¦ Information Management Standards
¦ Future Vision for EMII ¦
Home
Partners Comments: Portuguese museums that are digitizing
their collections are acquainted with international guidelines and standards of
collections management such as the CIDOC (Guidelines for the Description of
Objects of Art) or ICONCLASS or AAT that they try to adapt to their own
procedures or specificity of their collections.
Nevertheless, since
this presents several difficulties, museums often ask for assistance to the IPM,
the institution of Central Administration who has the obligation to divulge
general procedures for classification of collections, standards and guidelines
for portable heritage inventory and cataloguing. The need to divulge these
guidelines in the various fields of collections management amongst museums
belonging to the Ministry of Culture but also to all the other museums, has been
defined as a priority of action which has determined the definition of several
publications aimed to collection classification methods but also concerning
procedures in cataloguing, handling and care, conservation, storage and
circulation guidelines, some of which have already been published and others
being elaborated with museum professionals, and will be published during the
next three years.
We also asked what Collections Management Software is in use:
| MATRIZ (Commercially
available) ParaRede Av. Jose Malhoa n21 1070-157 Lisboa Portugal INARTE (Commercially available) Sistemas do Futuro Centro Empresarial do Capitolio Av. de Frana, 256, 4, Sala 4.3 4050 Porto Portugal Inventarios Gesto Integral do Patrimnio Cultural (Commercially available) C.O.M. Rua Fernando Palha, 50/54 - Ed.Simol 1900-695 Lisboa Portugal DOCBASE (Commercially available) DID, Documentaçã Informatica e Desenvolvimento, LDA. Avenida Ressano Garcia 27/RC 1070 Lisboa ENDOVELICUS (Commercially available) (although this is a software to register archaeological sites, using geographical information systems, it include some fields where you can add and describe the objects associated with a particular site) Chiron / Sistemas de Informação Edificio Univova Campus da Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia / Universidade Nova de Lisboa 2825-114 Monte da Caparica |
¦
National Overview ¦ International
Initiatives ¦ National Initiatives ¦
Regional Initiatives ¦ Procedural
Standards ¦ Information Management Standards
¦ Future Vision for EMII ¦
Home
We asked about:
Partners Comments: In this particular area we feel that
collaboration with other institutions that have a wider experience and
production in this area will be very important in order to ensure a better
access and provide wider information dissemination in Portuguese museums.
There
is a strong need to promote other tools, namely vocabularies, thesauri and term
lists. In this particular area we feel that collaboration with other
institutions that have a wider experience and production in this area will be
very important in order to ensure a better access and provide wider information
dissemination in Portuguese museums.
Term lists in use include:
Classification systems include:
Museums are not generally aware of these standards, therefore they are not being followed in a systematic way. Although there is awareness of the developments in metadata standards for museums, Portuguese museums are not employing any as yet.
Bibliographic Description Standards in use:
| Standard | No of Museums | No of Resources | Figures are: | |
| ISBD(A) | Older Monographic Publications (Antiquarian) | 100 | 24000 | Estimated |
| ISBD(CM) | Cartographic Material | 30 | unknown | Estimated |
| ISBD(EP) | Electronic Publications | 0 | 0 | Unknown |
| ISBD(M) | Monographic Publications | 209 | 2200000 | Estimated |
| ISBD(NBM) | Non Book Materials | 209 | 1200000 | Estimated |
| ISBD(PM) | Printed Music | 14 | 24500 | Estimated |
| ISBD(S) | Serials | 209 | 78000 | Estimated |
Partners Comment: These numbers were extrapolated from a smaller sample of museums that included precise numbers for these standards. Electronic publications were not considered, therefore numbers are unknown. The same applies to the number of resources in cartographic publications. It is estimated that the MARC Format is used in 144 museums. AACR2 is not used in Portugal. ISAD (G) is known but not used is Portugal.
119 museums have Web sites all of them created using HTML.110 museums have an estimated 233,000 digital images in JPEG format, the standard along with MPEG determined by the IPM for use by its museums. Z39.50 has not yet been implemented by any museum or museum organization in Portugal. The partner was not able to supply information on technological standards and protocols for the protection of intellectual property.
¦
National Overview ¦ International
Initiatives ¦ National Initiatives ¦
Regional Initiatives ¦ Procedural
Standards ¦ Information Management Standards
¦ Future Vision for EMII ¦
Home
The Portugese response to our question:
'Please use this space to describe ways in which you consider EMII should develop to provide a value added resource to museums in your country. Feel free to address any aspect of our current remit or to propose new roles. You may be as detailed as you like and include references to publications, Web sites, iniatives etc. Whilst we are developing our vision for EMII's future activities we also want to ensure that we capture your needs and concerns.'
The Portuguese Institute of Museums (IPM) is at present in
charge of establishing a network of co-operation between Portuguese museums.
With this task came the need to launch a questionnaire to all Portuguese museums
and self-called museums, in order to characterise them and their regular
practices.
The report that resulted from this questionnaire, was
recently published by the IPM and gives us detailed information that will be
fundamental to define a national policy for Portuguese museums and at the same
time proceed with the construction of the Portuguese Network of Museums (RPM).
The
next step will be to define in what terms the Portuguese Network of Museums will
be established, as well as what role the most active, well equipped and better
financed museums will have in the process of qualification of a larger number of
museums. We thus feel that this Network will have to be decentralised,
transversal to the various typologies of museums and collections and profoundly
articulated with the activities, expectations and needs of their communities,
through a self conscious awareness of its role at a national, regional or local
level.
One of the main objectives of the RPM will be to divulge
criteria that will regulate the creation of museums in order to avoid the
proliferation of "museological situations" that in truth are no more
than "collections", "traditions" or "legacies",
but tend to identify themselves as being museums.
Another goal will be
to qualify institutions that already exist, through the establishment of several
networks of mutual help, in order to help a greater number of museums to acquire
the minimal conditions for safeguard and fruition of their collections and at
the same time be in accordance with national and international requirements in
what concerns venues, research of collections, human resources, budget and
activities for the public.
In this context, IPM participation in EMII
institutionalisation acquires an enormous relevance, due to the opportunities it
represents to achieve the following goals:
These benefits resume the uniqueness of the EMII project and the possibilities that its future implementation represents in terms of a wider access and debate of all the European institutions with responsibilities in museum and collections management.
¦
National Overview ¦ International
Initiatives ¦ National Initiatives ¦
Regional Initiatives ¦ Procedural
Standards ¦ Information Management Standards
¦ Future Vision for EMII
|
Standards Map Home Page------------Home Page |
Funded by the
European Commission -Education
and Culture Directorate-General -
Raphaël
Programme
Created on 07 July 2000